Sebastian County Conservation District
Resource LibraryNative Plants
🌿Native Plants

Deer-Resistant Native Plantings

5 min readReference
Share

Deer browse is one of the most common frustrations for landowners trying to establish native plantings in Sebastian County. White-tailed deer populations are high throughout the Ouachita foothills, and young plants are particularly vulnerable in their first two growing seasons. The good news: many native species are naturally less palatable to deer, and a few simple strategies can protect even the most vulnerable plantings.

Naturally Resistant Species

Several native species are rarely browsed by deer under normal population pressures. Aromatic plants are generally avoided — wild bergamot, bee balm, and mountain mint are seldom touched. Spiny or rough-textured plants like native thistles, ironweed, and roughleaf dogwood are also low on the deer menu. Ferns — particularly Christmas fern and cinnamon fern — are almost never browsed and make excellent groundcover under established trees.

Protecting Vulnerable Species

Trees and shrubs are most vulnerable in their first two years, before they develop bark thick enough to resist browsing. Individual tree tubes — plastic cylinders staked around each transplant — are the most effective protection for young trees and pay for themselves quickly by eliminating replacement costs. For larger areas, a temporary electric fence during the establishment period is cost-effective. Once trees reach six to eight feet in height, deer browse pressure drops significantly.

Strategic Planting Design

Planting resistant species as a perimeter around more vulnerable ones can reduce browse pressure on the interior. Dense plantings also help — deer are less likely to push into a thick planting than to browse along an open edge. Avoid planting in long, thin strips along field edges where deer can easily access every plant from both sides. Compact, irregular plantings with multiple species are more resilient than monoculture rows.

Repellents

Commercial deer repellents can be effective for small, high-value plantings. Products containing putrescent egg solids are among the most effective and longest-lasting. Repellents must be reapplied after rain and as new growth emerges — they protect only the tissue that was treated at the time of application. For large-scale restoration plantings, repellents are generally not cost-effective compared to physical protection or species selection.

Key Takeaways

  • Aromatic species like wild bergamot and mountain mint are rarely browsed
  • Tree tubes are the most cost-effective protection for individual transplants
  • Compact, multi-species plantings resist browse better than thin monoculture rows
  • Deer pressure drops significantly once trees reach 6–8 feet in height